Close Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Our Word Chefs
  • Write for us
  • Categories ———-
  • Food & Drink
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Retail
  • Health
  • ——————
  • Policies
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookies
Facebook X (Twitter)
  • Home
  • Latest
  • About
  • Our Word Chefs
  • Contact
Food Future
  • Food & Drink
  • Health
  • Events
  • Entertainment
  • Hospitality
  • Retail
  • Travel
  • News
Food Future
Home » Latest » Why are most companies failing to benefit from AI? It’s about the people not the tech, says new study
AI

Why are most companies failing to benefit from AI? It’s about the people not the tech, says new study

Lucy ContrinoBy Lucy Contrino13/08/20254 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Successful uptake of new technology is a matter of emotions — and with 4 in 5 companies saying they’re failing to capitalise on its potential, managers need to know how to deal with them, say researchers from Aalto University.

Greater Helsinki, Finland — AI has the potential to enhance decision-making, spark innovation and help leaders boost employees’ productivity, according to recent research. Many large companies have invested accordingly, in the form of both funding and effort. Yet despite this, studies show that they are failing to achieve the expected benefits, with as many as 80 percent of companies reporting a failure to benefit from the new technology.

‘Often employees fail to embrace new AI and benefit from it, but we don’t really know why,’ says Assistant Professor Natalia Vuori from Aalto University. Our limited understanding stems partly from the tendency to study these failings as limitations of the technologies themselves, or from the perspective of users’ cognitive judgments about AI performance, she says.

‘What we learned is that success is not so much about technology and its capabilities, but about the different emotional and behavioural reactions employees develop towards AI — and how leaders can manage these reactions,” says Vuori. 

Her research team followed a consulting company of 600 employees for over a year as it attempted to develop and implement the use of a new artificial intelligence tool. The tool was supposed to collect employees’ digital footprints and map their skills and abilities, ultimately building a capabilities map of the company. The results were supposed to streamline the team selection process for consulting projects, and the whole experiment was, in fact, a pilot for AI software they hoped to offer their own customers.

After almost two years, the company buried the experiment — and the proposed product. So what happened?

It turns out, although some staff believed that the tool performed well and was very valuable, they were not comfortable with AI following their calendar notes, internal communications and daily dealings. As a result, employees either stopped providing information altogether, or they started manipulating the system by feeding it information they thought would benefit their career path. This led to the AI becoming increasingly inaccurate in its output, feeding a vicious cycle as users started losing faith in its abilities.

‘Leaders couldn’t understand why the AI usage was declining. They were taking a lot of action to promote the tools and so on, trying to explain how they use the data, but it didn’t help,’ says Vuori, who believes this case study reflects a common pattern when it comes to AI uptake, and tech adoption generally. 

The team is now collecting data on the use of Microsoft’s widely used Copilot AI software, which is so far yielding similar findings.

What should leaders do?

Researchers found that people fell into the same four groups in terms of their reaction to the new technology. Distinguishing between cognitive trust; whether a person believes the technology performs well, and emotional trust; their feelings towards the system, the groups were: full trust, full distrust, uncomfortable trust and blind trust.

People in the first group had high trust both on the cognitive and emotional level, whereas people in the second group scored low on both. Uncomfortable trust signified high cognitive trust but low emotional trust, and vice versa for blind trust.

The less people trusted the tool emotionally, the more they restricted, withdrew or manipulated their digital footprint, and it was particularly notable that this held true even if they had cognitive trust in the technology. 

The findings give companies the chance to strategise a more successful approach to AI uptake. 

“AI adoption isn’t just a technological challenge — it’s a leadership one. Success hinges on understanding trust and addressing emotions, and making employees feel excited about using and experimenting with AI,” says Vuori. “Without this human-centered approach, and strategies that are tailored to address the needs of each group, even the smartest AI will fail to deliver on its potential.” 

The research findings were published in the Journal of Management Studies on 22 January.

Post Views: 258
Lucy Contrino
  • Website

Related Posts

Technology 16/09/2025

How Mobile App Development Supports An Agency’s Growth

Technology 02/07/2025

How can online casino players keep safe from cybersecurity threats in 2025?

Technology 01/07/2025

Huddersfield software firm Adventoris hits milestone of £2bn of customer orders processed following new client wins

Technology 05/06/2025

The Checkout Revolution: Why Optimized Payment Flows Drive Higher Conversions

Top Picks

STICKS’N’SUSHI BRINGS ‘ALL YOU CAN SIP’ BRUNCH TO SHOREDITCH

22/09/2025

ANTONIO CARLUCCIO’S PASSION FOR MUSHROOMS BROUGHT TO LIFE AT TOZI VICTORIA SUPPORTING THE ANTONIO CARLUCCIO FOUNDATION

21/09/2025

The Radiator Mistakes Silently Adding £600 to Your Heating Bill

20/09/2025

Mix and Match: Creating a Pan-Asian Party Menu That Brings Everyone to the Table

20/09/2025
Socialise With Us

Here at Food Future, we are a dedicated team of culinary enthusiasts passionate about writing food and drink experiences.

Beyond being a mere collection of recipes and guides, our platform is a celebration of the rich culinary landscape.

Join us in tasting the essence of tomorrow, today!

hello@foodfuture.org.uk

Our Picks

Forgotten Cooling Hack Making a Comeback for Britain’s Elderly – Expert Shares Natural Tips to Beat the Heat

By Lucy Contrino01/07/2025

BonCulina Appoints Industry Leading Expert to Drive its Home Delivery Division

By Karen Contrino07/01/2025

Pocket Aces and Travel Snacks: How to Host the Perfect Online Poker Night on the Go

By Karen Contrino09/05/2025

Subscribe for Updates

Unleash a world of flavour in your inbox – subscribe now for a taste of Food Future's culinary delights

  • Home
  • About
  • Our Word Chefs
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap

© FoodFuture.org.uk | All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}